Cem Ilkel vs Abel Forger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs A. Forger

Cem Ilkel
TUR
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
20
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
586
C. Rank
792
144
Best Rank
743
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$225.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Abel Forger
NED
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
20
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
586
C. Rank
792
144
Best Rank
743
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$225.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Forger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Abel Forger winning 0. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Abel Forger was at the M15 Zahra, 07-02-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ilkel | 1 |
| Forger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Zahra(02-07-25)
Cem Ilkel
6
6
Abel Forger
4
3
C. Ilkel vs A. Forger H2H Profile
C. Ilkel vs A. Forger Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 67.50% of points on their second serve, while Abel Forger has won 44.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 45.90% of their opponent's second serve points, while Abel Forger has won 49.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 14.43% and 26.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Abel Forger has saved 53.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Abel Forger winning 62.12% (W/L 41/25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Abel Forger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 35/19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 27/30).
- Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Abel Forger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.08% of matches (W/L 41/24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 1 times and Abel Forger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Abel Forger winning 0.
- The last match between Cem Ilkel and Abel Forger was at the M15 Zahra, 07-02-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:5.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 424.21 while Abel Forger has played against players with an average rank of 399.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Abel Forger has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 12.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Abel Forger has converted 28.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cem Ilkel vs Abel Forger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Ilkel vs A. Forger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:51:5 | Average Match Time | 1:51:5 |
| 56% (40/72) | 1st Serve % | 66% (41/62) |
| 70% (28/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (27/41) |
| 66% (21/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/9) |
| 42% (26/62) | Return Points Win % | 32% (23/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ilkel 58%, Forger 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ilkel 52%, Forger 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Ilkel 61%, Forger 64%.
C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
A. Forger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 7-6(7) 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | ||

C. Ilkel vs A. Forger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.52% (438/337) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.93% (66/52) |
| 54.63% (979/813) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.60% (149/119) |
| 51.54% (8791/8267) | Games Win/Loss | 54.14% (1346/1140) |
| 61.41% (288/181) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.81% (35/19) |
| 44.53% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.37% (27/30) |
| 54.76% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 10.00% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2865 | Aces Total | 312 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1385 | Total Double Faults | 449 |
| 1:15:9 | Average Match Time | 1:38:18 |
| 560.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.5 |
| 58% (24152/41308) | 1st Serve % | 62% (4427/7149) |
| 70% (16999/24152) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2991/4427) |
| 51% (8757/17156) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1277/2722) |
| 40% (1622/4023) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (361/808) |
| 39% (16247/41803) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3038/7154) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17.86% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.23% (176/161) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 66.39% (241/122) | Futures W/L | 56.41% (66/51) |
| 56% (426/756) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (64/115) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (147/275) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (13/26) |
| 56% (130/233) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (15/34) |
| 85% (424/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (67/58) |
| 14% (424/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (67/9) |
| 21% (350/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (50/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 23 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 05:50 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 07:00 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 08:35 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:10
H2H 0-0
22:00
H2H 0-0
22:00
H2H 0-0
22:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Hersonissos 7 Challenger
Greece
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece